# Can You Explain White's Winning Plan?

This is another puzzle from the great Zinar. Can you find white's winning plan? Can you explain why that first move works when similar ones don't?

5K2/2p5/8/2k5/8/2P5/4P3/8 w - - 0 1

Yancey_Ward

Editor

Alena, open this thread up to seen an important message.

Yancey_Ward

Editor

The difference is incredibly subtle and is the entire point of Zinar's puzzle.

Yancey_Ward

Editor

To find the problem, you will have to go several moves beyond those two lines where white has queened at d8. What you will find are two positions that look almost identical, but, very, very countintuitively, one is winning for white while the other isn't.

Yancey_Ward

Editor

The first part of the last paragraph is completely correct about 1.Ke7, but I don't think the second part really describes the problem that white creates for himself with 1.Kf7. What I would suggest, Alena, is to carefully study the lines that start with 1.Kg7 Kd5 2.Kf7 and compare them to the line that starts 1.Kf7 Kd5 2.Kf6. The problem isn't that white loses both pawns, but that queening the e-pawn in the latter position doesn't lead to a win, but that he is still one tempo ahead in the first line, which makes all the difference in the world.

Alena

V-1

1.Kg7! Kd5
2.Kf7 Kc4
3.e4 Kxc3
4.e5 c5
5.e6 c4
6.e7 Kd2
7.e8=Q c3
8.Qd8+ Kc1
9.Qg5+ Kb1
10.Qg1+ Kb2
11.Qd4 Kb3
12.Ke6 c2
13.Qa1 Kc4
14.Qc1
It's a win for white.

V-2

1.Kg7 Kd5
2.Kf7 Kd6
3.Kf6 Kd5
4.Kf5 Kd6
5.e4 Ke7
6.Ke5 Kf7
7.Kd5 Ke7
8.Kc6 Kd8
9.c4 Kc8
10.e5 Kd8
11.e6 Ke8
12.Kxc7
It's a win for white.

Ke7 loses because it's on the same file as the white pawn. Therefore white loses an important tempo and black has time to put the black pawn on c2. Kf7 and e4 loses too because black gets the opposition and controls white pawns.

EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment
EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment
EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment
EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment
1
EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment
EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment
EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment
EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment
EditorSusanPolgar
New Comment